Fourth and nth party risk

Situational context of fourth risk

The business ecosystem is converging to a latent and complex reality, due to today's hyper-connectivity, where risk management extends to third, fourth and nth parties; being the cornerstone of corporate resilience.

Considering that many organizations focus their efforts on protecting their own systems, infrastructure and technology and cyber architecture. But the reality is that the real risk often resides in our attack surface environments and cyber exposure that is invisible and unmonitored; but, also, in many occasions even if you have visibility you do not have full control to apply actions that minimize exposure.

A single vulnerability in one supplier can expose your entire organization to catastrophic consequences.

Risk management in the supply chain

Are you aware of the extent to which your suppliers are integrated into your operations, have you considered the cascading effects of a cyber disruption to one of your suppliers' systems, did you know that the effects can be equal or opposite in proportion?

As we delve deeper into the complexities of risk management, it becomes clear that safeguarding your organization requires a holistic approach, rigorously assessing and mitigating risks throughout the supply chain.

You have taken into account that your suppliers are likely to be taking critical activities to other suppliers.

It's all part of cross-functional operations, so as we want to drive cost efficiencies and improve our management, so do suppliers. However, your suppliers' contracts with third parties introduce additional operational, legal, strategic, financial, cybersecurity and compliance risks for your company.

A breach can trigger a cascade of regulatory fines, damage customer confidence and cause significant financial losses.

Before learning some of the details, it is worth noting that it encompasses both our suppliers' suppliers and those that subcontract services without our control and visibility.

This vast, intricate and complex web of interrelated business relationships represents a major threat. Lack of awareness of the risks that exist within this network leaves your organization vulnerable.

What is Fourth Party Risk Management (FPRM)?

Fourth Party Risk Management (FPRM) is the process that involves identifying, assessing and reducing cybersecurity risks presented by your third-party vendors' suppliers. As digital transformation blurs the lines between IT ecosystems, any of your suppliers could become hotspots of vulnerability and potential systemic cybersecurity risk.

Despite awareness of third-party risks, fourth-party risks are often overlooked. This negligence creates vulnerabilities because organizations may not be fully aware of or manage the security practices of their third-party vendors.

This risk management is essential because it addresses the often overlooked vulnerabilities that can arise from an organization's extensive network of third-party vendors. Moreover, when an organization partners with a third party, it implicitly relies on that entity's security measures. However, the third party may rely on other “fourth-party” providers for its operations.

⚠️ If these fourth parties have inadequate security practices, they can introduce significant risks into the parent organization's network. This extended chain of trust can become a pathway for cyber threats, data breaches and other security incidents.

✅ So it is essential to manage and mitigate risks from direct suppliers and also from their vendors.

Data protection and compliance

In addition, regulatory compliance and data privacy laws are becoming increasingly stringent, requiring organizations to ensure robust security throughout their supply chain. Failure to manage third-party risks can result in regulatory penalties, legal liabilities and reputational damage.

By implementing a comprehensive fourth-party risk management program, organizations can gain better visibility into their entire supply chain, identify potential vulnerabilities and enforce strict security standards at all levels of their supplier network. This proactive approach not only strengthens the organization's overall security posture, but also helps maintain compliance and build trust with customers and stakeholders.

✅ We must keep in mind that the difference between third-party risk management and fourth- and nth-party risk management lies in the scope and focus of the entities being managed and assessed for security risks.

Third- and fourth-party risk management

Third Party Risk Management (TPRM) focuses on identifying, assessing and mitigating the risks associated with third party vendors, suppliers or service providers with whom a company has a direct relationship. The main objective is to ensure that these external entities comply with regulatory requirements, respect contractual obligations and do not introduce vulnerabilities into the company's operations.

From this perspective, TRPM involves activities such as due diligence, regular monitoring, audits and implementation of controls to manage risks related to data security, financial stability and operational performance of third parties.

In contrast, Forth Risk Management (FPRM) extends this oversight to the third parties' own subcontractors or service providers, effectively managing the risks introduced by the extended supply chain. These fourth parties, although not directly contracted by the parent company, can significantly affect its operations and risk profile.

✅ Managing the risk of the fourth parties requires visibility into the risk management practices of the third parties and often involves obtaining assurances that these downstream entities also adhere to strict standards. This level of risk management ensures a more comprehensive approach to securing the supply chain and mitigating potential disruptions or compliance issues arising from indirect relationships.

Geopolitics and cyberdiplomacy influence the management of fourth-party risks

Geopolitics and cyber diplomacy are integral to cross-border and transnational risk management of quarters as they shape regulatory environments, influence international cybersecurity cooperation, and affect the activities of cyber threat actors.

By navigating geopolitical complexities, engaging in cyber diplomacy efforts and staying informed about the global cyber threat landscape, organizations can improve their resilience in the face of transnational cyber risks. This global approach is essential to safeguard the security and integrity of their extended supply chains in an interconnected and dynamic global environment.

Fourth-party risks are especially insidious because they are often several levels away from your direct control. These risks originate from your suppliers' suppliers, entities with which you may have no direct communication or oversight. This complexity creates a scenario in which the security measures of a seemingly distant supplier can directly affect your organization's security posture.

✅ Consider the scenario in which a fourth-party supplier handles critical data or services. If this entity suffers a breach, the impact reverberates through the supply chain, potentially disrupting operations and exposing sensitive information. This interconnected network means your security is only as strong as the weakest link in your extended network.

Fourth-party risk mitigation

To mitigate fourth-party risks, organizations must implement both proactive and reactive measures. Proactively, this involves rigorous vetting processes for third-party suppliers, requiring them to disclose their own supply chain security practices and measures.

Ongoing monitoring and periodic audits of these practices ensure that your suppliers maintain the highest safety standards.

Reactive measures are equally important. It is essential to develop a robust incident response plan that includes protocols for third-party and fourth-party breaches. This plan should outline clear communication channels, steps to mitigate damage, and procedures for notifying stakeholders and regulatory agencies.

A robust incident response plan should include protocols for breaches by third- and fourth-parties.

Conclusion

As the cyber threat landscape evolves, so must risk management practices. Future trends indicate a growing emphasis on collaborative defense strategies, where industries work together to share threat intelligence and best practices.

In addition, regulatory requirements are becoming increasingly stringent, demanding greater transparency and accountability from organizations regarding their supply chain security measures.

Cyber Security

How DRP (Digital Risk Protection) solutions protect your business from cyberthreats

November 6, 2023

Image: Drazen Zigic / Freepik.